Total Information Awareness, Rebooted
The dots were always everywhere, now they can finally connect them.
I’ve gotten a fair number of questions about the Planatir news, so let me lay out a few key things to keep in mind.
First:
The U.S. government has had this kind of capability—the ability to know anything about you, almost instantly—for decades.
Yeah. Decades.
Ever wonder how, three seconds before a terrorist attack, we know nothing, but three seconds after, we suddenly know their full bio, travel record, high school GPA, what they had for breakfast, the lap dance they got the night before, and the last time they took a dump?
Yeah. Data collection isn’t the problem. It never has been. The problem is, and always has been, connecting the dots.
The U.S. government vacuums up data 24/7. Some of it legally. Some of it… less so. And under the Trump Regime, let’s be honest—we're not exactly seeing a culture of legal compliance over at DHS, the FBI, or anywhere else. Unless Pete Hegseth adds a hooker or a media executive to a Signal thread and it leaks, we're not going to know what they're doing.
But the safest bet? Assume Title 50 is out the f*ing window.
For the uninitiated: Title 50 governs U.S. intelligence operations. It prohibits turning that machinery—especially things like NTM (national technical means) or the NSA’s bulk intercept tools—against Americans.
There are exceptions. But they’re narrow. And they exist precisely to prevent a situation where someone like TACO can ruin your life because he’s having a hissy fit and is enabled by a ketamine-fueled choade with root access.
And yet—here we are.
Second:
From day one, it’s been obvious: the people running this clown car—Big Balls, DOGE, and the rest—aren’t in it to streamline government. They’re in it for the data. Full stop.
The U.S. government already has mountains of it. If you’ve ever filled out an SF-86? They have even more. If you’ve ever taken a polygraph? Multiply that by ten.
They know your bank accounts.
Your credit history.
And if they fuse that with your online footprint—browsing history, purchases, subscriptions?
They can build a disturbingly accurate model of your life.
For decades, that fusion didn’t exist. There were legal barriers, cultural lines, and hard technical limits.
Now? All of that is eroding.
The question isn’t if they’ll put the puzzle together. The question is what happens after they do.
Third:
Enter AI.
AI allows all this fragmented data—financial, behavioral, medical, social, psychological—to be crushed, correlated, and turned into a behavioral weapon. Add quantum computing in the next decade, and you’re not looking at dystopia. You’re looking at an operating system for soft authoritarianism.
It’s not hard to game this out.
Let’s say you’re TACO, and you’re pissed people keep calling you TACO. So what do you do? You punch up your ketamine-fueled choade on the phone, and you tell him to run the system, and he tells Big Balls to run the numbers, and boom—you now have every bit of dirt imaginable on the person who dared criticize you.
The porn he watches. The newsletters he reads. Where he shops. What meds he’s on. What he searches for at 2:13 a.m.
If I can target people anonymously for marketing, you better believe the government can de-anonymize that same data with Palantir-level infrastructure—and use it to find pressure points. And once they know where to push, it’s game on.
You call up your blonde attorney general, and suddenly there’s a grand jury. Indictments start flying. Or maybe she just calls the VIP suite at some Vegas club to pass the word. The FBI director dials in next—wiretaps get authorized, surveillance ramps up. Or maybe it’s more subtle: he calls Tulsi. She spins up the NSA and CIA. Now you’ve got teams digging into your life 24/7—looking for anything to wreck your business, torch your relationships, and blow a hole in your future.
Sound far-fetched? Maybe, but that’s what this system could enable.
So what’s the point of all this?
It’s not about mass population control—yet. The computational load is still too high. But targeted intimidation? Loyalty tests? Punishment systems? Entirely possible. What is possible is a system that subtly punishes people.
Imagine a world where:
If you insult the President online, your Social Security checks are delayed.
If you post something critical of the regime, your tax returns get flagged.
If you fail a digital loyalty test, your traffic stop turns into a beating.
Maybe your passport doesn’t get renewed.
Maybe you are detained for hours at the border.
Maybe your passport is revoked for “national security reasons.”
Maybe you’re audited—every, single, year.
Maybe you’re disqualified from any federal benefit.
All technically plausible if you have a fully integrated AI data weapon.
That’s why they wanted to breach the Social Security Information.
That’s why they wanted access to the entire U.S. Government Payment system.
That’s why they wanted access to all of the IRS records.
That’s why.
Sure, the excuse was “cracking down on illegals.” But that was a cover story. The real prize? Building the mother of all databases, mining the American bureaucracy for every last atom of your life.
This is Goering and Himmler’s wet dream, just with dashboards and APIs instead of boots and bullets.
It’s not entirely here yet. But it’s not science fiction either.
And the real limiting factor? Correlation and analysis power. That’s always been the bottleneck. But if I, as a private marketer, can use AI to pinpoint intent from click trails and email opens… what can a government do with real-time ingestion of health records, voice logs, browser data, and geolocation?
So yeah—this is the most terrifying infrastructure ever built, and we’re sleepwalking through it.
In 2003, DARPA’s Admiral John Poindexter proposed a system called Total Information Awareness (TIA). When the public found out, we lost our minds. Congress defunded it. It died on paper.
In 2013, Edward Snowden exposed PRISM and Upstream: real-time collection of American communications, routed directly into NSA systems—without warrants. Internet traffic. Emails. Metadata. Everything.
We freaked out again. Snowden fled. The system retracted. Or so we were told.
But now?
It’s back. And it’s running.
If there’s good news? It’ll cost trillions to scale—thousands of acres of servers, and endless compute capacity. Maybe that slows it down.
But don’t count on it.
Because this isn’t about controlling “everyone.”
It’s about controlling anyone.
And that… is enough.
You don’t need to put every head on a pike to show you’re in charge.
You just need to put the right one on a pike.
Like what you just read?
Subscribe to The Long Memo for weekly dispatches on politics, power, and the architecture of collapse—before it hardens. We don’t do engagement bait. We do warning shots.
Please share it, if you think it will be helpful for others. (Sharing is caring.)
Please comment, if you think I missed something or have something to add.
I'd read something of this maybe two months ago, when Big Ballz & the Crewe were rummaging through our collective underwear drawers looking for bondage gear, maybe? Whatever gets incels off. But seriously, folks, this datafication of our overarching relationship with 'our' government is super-freaky. It strikes me that the giant computer farms which will have to be built, maintained and above all powered, not to mention avoided as producers of incredible amounts of noise and airborne and who knows what other kinds of pollution, are a weak link. I hope some people out there are already thinking about how to put a stick into those spokes. That's assuming that insufficient numbers of our elected representatives at the local, state and federal levels of government remain asleep at the wheel.
This seems entirely accurate to me, and I envy how clearly and directly you lay out what amounts to the central but least publicized threat that DOGE posed from the start, along with Trump's March 20 executive order. Your list of the kinds of "small" ways one's data--almost anyone's, really--can be used to make life hard for a Trump enemy is the main thing that has prevented me from visiting the states (I am a citizen) since Trump was elected. Border crossings are fundamentally lawless zones, and "administrative mistakes" provide cover for any sort of lawlessness. The idea of having a lawyer on speed dial and carrying a burner phone seems crazy, but that's the advice these days. A hard story to get people to pay attention to, and this does a great job of breaking it down.